<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
> <channel><title> Comments on: How to Respond Like a Buddha When Your Teacher Is Accused of Abuse</title> <atom:link href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/</link> <description>Understanding and Healing Abuse in Buddhist Communities</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.20</generator> <item><title> By: Dummy (aka Marc)</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-522</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy (aka Marc)]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-522</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-151&quot;&gt;Sandra Pawula&lt;/a&gt;.Sandra wrote: &quot; we have to watch out for those holes!&quot; My questions: Is this blog a great example of these holes, and are further elaborations on this blog only making this whole bigger and more comfortable for those who dug it?TC (7:16): &quot;you can still say this action is not suitable and it is not appropriate but you don&#039;t get angry and upset&quot;. Can you? Is this enlightened view? Seeing the fact that the natural state (i.e. enlightenment) is beyond words and concepts. So it is clearly &quot;relative enlightenment&quot; that is being taught here by TC. (i.e. a contradiction in terms). Relative bodhicitta. Food for dummies...You can still say this action is not suitable and is not appropriate, but -by defintion of the words &quot;suitable&quot; and &quot;appropriate- this implies it is relative to some (be it a mojority). So the &quot;not suitable&quot; and &quot;not appropriate&quot; is NOT some inherent quality of the action (hitting a student in the stomach), nor the actor, but arises in dependence on the acted upon. So you can still say it, but it is ultimately groundless, so why utter it? It is only digging the whole (of dualistic habituation) deeper. Only dummies do that...It is not about visualising yourself as the deity and acting from that perspective that is the core of practice, it is about the DISSOLTION of the deity (into emptiness). Right conduct is maintaining in thát openminded state during all of your actions. Visualisation of yourself as the deity and acting from thát perspective  is for dummies.And it is not about negating ones emotions by not getting &quot;angry and upset&quot;, it is about seeing ones emotions as they really are. Seeing their nature. But this necessarily implies that you actually EXPERIENCE these emotions. Isn&#039;t it? Negating ones emotions is also for dummies. What TC is teaching is for dummiesIndeed, this post is intended to make you upset. Maybe even angry ;) As upset as a mahasiddhas! As upset as yogis!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-151">Sandra Pawula</a>.</p><p>Sandra wrote: &#8221; we have to watch out for those holes!&#8221; My questions: Is this blog a great example of these holes, and are further elaborations on this blog only making this whole bigger and more comfortable for those who dug it?</p><p>TC (7:16): &#8220;you can still say this action is not suitable and it is not appropriate but you don&#8217;t get angry and upset&#8221;. Can you? Is this enlightened view? Seeing the fact that the natural state (i.e. enlightenment) is beyond words and concepts. So it is clearly &#8220;relative enlightenment&#8221; that is being taught here by TC. (i.e. a contradiction in terms). Relative bodhicitta. Food for dummies&#8230;</p><p>You can still say this action is not suitable and is not appropriate, but -by defintion of the words &#8220;suitable&#8221; and &#8220;appropriate- this implies it is relative to some (be it a mojority). So the &#8220;not suitable&#8221; and &#8220;not appropriate&#8221; is NOT some inherent quality of the action (hitting a student in the stomach), nor the actor, but arises in dependence on the acted upon. So you can still say it, but it is ultimately groundless, so why utter it? It is only digging the whole (of dualistic habituation) deeper. Only dummies do that&#8230;</p><p>It is not about visualising yourself as the deity and acting from that perspective that is the core of practice, it is about the DISSOLTION of the deity (into emptiness). Right conduct is maintaining in thát openminded state during all of your actions. Visualisation of yourself as the deity and acting from thát perspective  is for dummies.</p><p>And it is not about negating ones emotions by not getting &#8220;angry and upset&#8221;, it is about seeing ones emotions as they really are. Seeing their nature. But this necessarily implies that you actually EXPERIENCE these emotions. Isn&#8217;t it? Negating ones emotions is also for dummies. What TC is teaching is for dummies</p><p>Indeed, this post is intended to make you upset. Maybe even angry 😉 As upset as a mahasiddhas! As upset as yogis!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Sandra Pawula</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-513</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Pawula]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 23:18:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-513</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-509&quot;&gt;Kathy R.&lt;/a&gt;.I&#039;m glad you found it helpful, Kathy.  Wishing you well.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-509">Kathy R.</a>.</p><p>I&#8217;m glad you found it helpful, Kathy.  Wishing you well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Kathy R.</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-509</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy R.]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 01:53:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-509</guid><description><![CDATA[This is helpful. Thank you Sandra.
Among many parts that were helpful, I found this part reflects many of the teachings we have already received many times:“...the tragedy is when people don’t learn other ways to see situations... in a more beneficial way. ... their usual, ordinary mind takes over and the result is just, you know, criticism, rubbish, gossip, and then, you know, they leave the practice, which is harmful to them.Student: Just to be clear about the pure view, it’s seeing situations as a result of your own karma, it’s not seeing others necessarily as buddhas and excusing any bad behavior that you see?TC: Yeah, that’s not the standard definition of pure view but that’s, definitely, if you’re practicing seeing yourself as the Buddha, [it&#039;s] some attitude, some outlook, some perspective, that you should have. Even in the Bodhisattva path, even in the fundamental vehicle path,  you know, what happens to me as a result of my karma, there’s no sense in getting mad at other people, because if i hadn’t created that in the past then i wouldn’t be experiencing this now. It doesn’t mean what the other person is doing is right, it means you’re taking responsibility for your part in it. When ever we blame, then we dig ourselves into a hole, [as if one says] &quot;I can’t release my anger until they apologize.&quot; You dig yourself into a hole, decorate the hole and then complain that you’re in it.”]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is helpful. Thank you Sandra.<br
/> Among many parts that were helpful, I found this part reflects many of the teachings we have already received many times:</p><p>“&#8230;the tragedy is when people don’t learn other ways to see situations&#8230; in a more beneficial way. &#8230; their usual, ordinary mind takes over and the result is just, you know, criticism, rubbish, gossip, and then, you know, they leave the practice, which is harmful to them.</p><p>Student: Just to be clear about the pure view, it’s seeing situations as a result of your own karma, it’s not seeing others necessarily as buddhas and excusing any bad behavior that you see?</p><p>TC: Yeah, that’s not the standard definition of pure view but that’s, definitely, if you’re practicing seeing yourself as the Buddha, [it&#8217;s] some attitude, some outlook, some perspective, that you should have. Even in the Bodhisattva path, even in the fundamental vehicle path,  you know, what happens to me as a result of my karma, there’s no sense in getting mad at other people, because if i hadn’t created that in the past then i wouldn’t be experiencing this now. It doesn’t mean what the other person is doing is right, it means you’re taking responsibility for your part in it. When ever we blame, then we dig ourselves into a hole, [as if one says] &#8220;I can’t release my anger until they apologize.&#8221; You dig yourself into a hole, decorate the hole and then complain that you’re in it.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Sandra Pawula</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-167</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Pawula]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-167</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-163&quot;&gt;Thelma&lt;/a&gt;.True, Thelma. I know it helps me to be reminded of these things again and again.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-163">Thelma</a>.</p><p>True, Thelma. I know it helps me to be reminded of these things again and again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Sandra Pawula</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-166</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Pawula]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-166</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-164&quot;&gt;Stephen&lt;/a&gt;.Thank you, Stephen.  I agree.  I only learned of the first two-talks later.  I&#039;ve also watched them and found them to be excellent.  I&#039;ll feature them in an upcoming blog post.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-164">Stephen</a>.</p><p>Thank you, Stephen.  I agree.  I only learned of the first two-talks later.  I&#8217;ve also watched them and found them to be excellent.  I&#8217;ll feature them in an upcoming blog post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Stephen</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-164</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:06:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-164</guid><description><![CDATA[I recommend watching the whole series of talks she gave on the &quot;crisis&quot;, from 26th-30th august I think]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend watching the whole series of talks she gave on the &#8220;crisis&#8221;, from 26th-30th august I think</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Thelma</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-163</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thelma]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:36:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-163</guid><description><![CDATA[Very good, Sandra. She reminds us of a lot of things we should know, but usually don&#039;t think about.
Thank you.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good, Sandra. She reminds us of a lot of things we should know, but usually don&#8217;t think about.<br
/> Thank you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Sandra Pawula</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-151</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Pawula]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 02:29:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-151</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-150&quot;&gt;sel&lt;/a&gt;.Hello Sel,  Those are important points!  Especially the first one, we don&#039;t always remember that.  I loved how she explained pure perception.  And, of course, we have to watch out for those holes!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-150">sel</a>.</p><p>Hello Sel,  Those are important points!  Especially the first one, we don&#8217;t always remember that.  I loved how she explained pure perception.  And, of course, we have to watch out for those holes!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: sel</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-150</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[sel]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:56:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-150</guid><description><![CDATA[For me two things stood out in this teaching: firstly, that pure vision means seeing yourself as a deity in the first place. For me, pure perception always was about how you view the teacher. Secondly: the bit about the hole of anger and blaming and how we fall so easily in there. &quot;You fall into the hole, decorate it nicely, and then complain you&#039;re in a hole&quot;  ;)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me two things stood out in this teaching: firstly, that pure vision means seeing yourself as a deity in the first place. For me, pure perception always was about how you view the teacher. Secondly: the bit about the hole of anger and blaming and how we fall so easily in there. &#8220;You fall into the hole, decorate it nicely, and then complain you&#8217;re in a hole&#8221;  😉</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title> By: Sandra Pawula</title><link>http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-147</link><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Pawula]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://howdidithappen.org/?p=196#comment-147</guid><description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-142&quot;&gt;Mary Finnigan&lt;/a&gt;.Hello Mary,This is so true.  It&#039;s not easy to work with difficult emotions and naturally they are going to arise, probably intensely, in a situation like this.  As you say, we might understand the idea intellectually but it&#039;s quite another to respond naturally.  There could be a danger of suppressing emotions, which doesn&#039;t help.  At least having the understand is a first step.  We can only do our best within our current capacity.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a
href="http://howdidithappen.org/respond-like-buddha-abuse-allegations/#comment-142">Mary Finnigan</a>.</p><p>Hello Mary,</p><p>This is so true.  It&#8217;s not easy to work with difficult emotions and naturally they are going to arise, probably intensely, in a situation like this.  As you say, we might understand the idea intellectually but it&#8217;s quite another to respond naturally.  There could be a danger of suppressing emotions, which doesn&#8217;t help.  At least having the understand is a first step.  We can only do our best within our current capacity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>